Legal Opinion

Argersinger v. Commonwealth Power Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1911No. Docket No. 80PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Jackson; Parkinson, J. Case by Byron S. Argersinger against the Commonwealth Power Company for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The defendant is engaged in the production, transmission, and sale of electric power of high voltage, in various cities, villages, and rural districts in this State. It employs several gangs of men in the reconstruction and repair of its system of poles and wires. These gangs are called “wire” or “line gangs.” They are in charge of men called by some witnesses superintendents and by others foremen. Each superintendent or foreman of a line gang has an assistant called an “assistant foreman.” It matters little what the man in charge of the gang is called. The practice was that he went with the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Beesley v. F. W. Wheeler & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Smith v. HumphreyvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. Schroeder v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Mikolojczak v. North American Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cusick v. Tamarack Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Fellows v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API