Legal Opinion

Dodd v. Witt

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 25, 1885PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Weit of entry to recover a parcel of land in North Adams. Plea, nul disseisin. Trial in the Superior Court, before Gardner, J., who directed a verdict for the demandant, and reported the case for the determination of this court. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

The demanded premises are a strip two rods wide on the westerly end of the lot described in the demandant’s deed. The demandant derives title from Reuben Whitman, *64who in May, 1866, conveyed the premises to Thomas H. Lid-ford by a description as follows : “ Commencing on the road at the southeast corner of the land that I gave D. H. Raymond a bond to convey; thence west 22 deg. 30 min. N. ten rods; thence south 22 degrees 30 minutes west four rods; thence east 22 degrees 30 minutes S. ten rods; thence south on the road to the place of beginning.” The descriptions in the mesne conveyances are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peck v. DennistonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Motley v. SargentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. White v. GodfreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  4. Hoar v. GouldingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  5. O' Connell v. BryantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kendall v. GreenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1893
  2. McKenzie v. GleasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Lamont Gas & Oil Co. v. Doop & FraterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Ovans v. CastrucciMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Beckman v. DavidsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API