Legal Opinion

In Re Brenn

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 9, 1950No. Patent Appeal 5680PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

The appellant believes that the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office erred in affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner who rejected all of the claims (1, 2, 6 to 12) of his application for letters patent for an improved “Method of Making Hectograph Master Forms.” The claims were rejected as unpatentable over a combination of patents. Those references are:

Cooper, 1,330,786, Feb. 17, 1920.

Lawson, 1,639,040, Aug. 16, 1927.

Willard, 1,753,764, Apr. 8, 1930.

Lewis et al., 2,118,888, May 31, 1938.

Foster (Reissue), 21,204, Sept. 12, 1939

Marchev, 2,216,594, Oct. 1,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re StoverCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  2. In Re FridolphCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  3. In re CaseyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  4. In re DalzellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  5. In re HaneyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re LaurentCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  2. Application of KamletCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  3. Cohee v. DanbergDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API