In Re Brenn
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
The appellant believes that the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office erred in affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner who rejected all of the claims (1, 2, 6 to 12) of his application for letters patent for an improved “Method of Making Hectograph Master Forms.” The claims were rejected as unpatentable over a combination of patents. Those references are:
Cooper, 1,330,786, Feb. 17, 1920.
Lawson, 1,639,040, Aug. 16, 1927.
Willard, 1,753,764, Apr. 8, 1930.
Lewis et al., 2,118,888, May 31, 1938.
Foster (Reissue), 21,204, Sept. 12, 1939
Marchev, 2,216,594, Oct. 1,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In Re StoverCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- In Re FridolphCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
- In re CaseyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
- In re DalzellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- In re HaneyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re LaurentCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Application of KamletCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Cohee v. DanbergDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2019