Legal Opinion

In re Haney

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 9, 1946No. 5202PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the .Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Primary Examiner in rejecting claims 1 to 8, inclusive, 15 and 16, being all the claims in appellants’ application for a patent for a process whereby solutions of organic derivatives of cellulose, including cellulose esters and cellulose acetate, may be clarified “by a simple filtration procedure” and used in the production particularly of articles in which a high degree of transparency is desired.

The references are—

Copland, 2,066',141, December 29, 1936.

Tinsley,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. In Re StoverCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  3. In Re FridolphCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  4. Application of BeachCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  5. In Re SaundersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re KuehlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. Application of CraigeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  3. In Re BrennCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  4. Application of BlondiauCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  5. Application of PatrickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API