Legal Opinion

In re Casey

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 27, 1948No. 5350PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the Primary Examiner who rejected all the claims in appellant’s application for alleged new and useful improvements in a journal box for use in a railway truck and more particularly to an improved hinge lug therefor.

The references are:

King, 1,445,693, February 20,1923.

Pope et al., 1,554,757, September 22,1925.

Adams, 1,640,228, August 23,1927.

Flodin et al., 2,126,546, August 9,1938.

Couch, 2,258,584, October 14,1941.

*870The attorneys for appellant have recited the rejected claims in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re StoverCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  2. In re BeesonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  3. In re SmythCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Application of Robert M. ColeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  2. Application of HallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  3. In re YountCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  4. In Re BrennCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  5. In re WaltersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API