Legal Opinion

In re Dalzell

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 7, 1946No. 5055PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the examiner in rejecting as unpatentable over the disclosure of the prior art claims 1 to- 4 and 6 to' 8 inclusive constituting all the claims in appellant’s application for a patent on a sanitary pip© coupling designed to handle liquid food stuffs such as dairy products which are passed through the coupled pipes uhder sub-atmospheric pressure.

Claims 1 and 6 are illustrative and sufficiently descriptive of appellant’s alleged invention. They read—

1. In a device of the class…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re StoverCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  2. In Re FridolphCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Application of Philip A. Shaffer, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  2. Application of Benjamin Gruskin, Deceased, by Irma Kelly GruskinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  3. Application of CarterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  4. In Re BrennCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  5. In re SpearsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API