Jameson v. Chanslor-Canfield Midway Oil Co.
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION to the Supreme Court for further security to be given by the appellant to stay execution pending appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. J. E. Prewett, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. E. W. Camp, Oscar Sutro, M. W. Reed, and U. T. Clotfelter, for Appellant. Waters & Goodcell, James F. Farraher, and Heney, Farraher & Johnson, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.
Respondents obtained a judgment against the defendant in the superior court adjudging them to be the owners and entitled to the possession of an undivided three-fourths of certain lands, and substantially directing that possession thereof be delivered to them. Defendant appealed to this court from such judgment, and the appeal is now pending herein. Desiring to stay execution of the judgment pending appeal defendant sought in the trial court an order fixing the amount of the necessary undertaking, and, according to the affidavit of respondents filed in this application, “said superior court,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hill v. FinniganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Kreling v. KrelingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Cluness v. BowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Boyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Doudell v. ShooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mendoza v. Small Claims Court of Los Angeles Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Eisenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Bonde v. SternNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
- Mehr v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- McClintock v. PowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.