Legal Opinion

Doudell v. Shoo

California Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1910No. S.F. No. 5613PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The application of the appellants for an order of this court fixing the amount for which the appellants shall give an undertaking on appeal, under sections 943 and 945 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is denied. The judgment appealed from directed the delivery of both real and personal property. In such cases the above-named sections require the judge of the court from which the appeal is taken to fix the amount of the undertaking to be given to obtain the statutory stay of proceedings on that part of the judgment. The supreme court has no jurisdiction to fix the amount for such undertaking.…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jameson v. Chanslor-Canfield Midway Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Adams v. PratherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Housing Authority v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1968
  4. Hinkel v. CrowsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API