Legal Opinion

Germain v. &198tna Life Ins. Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1938No. Docket No. 5, Calendar No. 39,792PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant upon an insurance policy to recover benefits to which, she claimed to be entitled and which defendant refused to pay. There was judgment for defendant, a motion for new trial made and denied, and plaintiff appeals.

Defendant issued group policy No. 5566 September 30, 1932, covering the lives of employees of the Bundy Tubing Company. This policy was renewed and was in force at the time of plaintiff’s injury February 25,1935. By a rider, dated April 27,1934, forming a part of the policy, it was provided female plant employees thereafter to be employed were to be eligible…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boseman v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Seavers v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1928
  3. All States Life Ins. Co. v. TillmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Gallagher v. Simmons Hardware Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. Austin v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Simms v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
  2. Humphrey v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. HardwickMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. General American Life Ins. v. WojciechowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Riske v. National Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API