Riske v. National Casualty Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Both the master policy and the certificate issued to the insured provide that the master policy, together with the applications of the union and of the insured individuals, constitute the entire contract. This is in harmony with the direction of sec. 204.32 (2) (b) 1, Stats., and the learned trial court, while criticizing the insurer for misinforming the insured, adjudged that the certificate could not and did not alter the terms of the regularly amended policy to which the certificate made specific reference. This view has considerable authoritative support. In Boseman v. Connecticut General…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boseman v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Smithart v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934
- Seavers v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1928
- Chrysler Corp. v. HardwickMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Germain v. &198tna Life Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
3Cited by20 opinions
- Mercado Ex Rel. Laufer v. MitchellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Kirkpatrick v. Boston Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Humphrey v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Lecker v. General American Life Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1974
- Blackburn, Nickels & Smith, Inc. v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.