Legal Opinion

Kendrick v. Bowen

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 15, 1987No. Civ. A. 83-3175PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

I. INTRODUCTION 1551

II. BACKGROUND 1552

III. BECAUSE THE MATERIAL FACTS ARE NOT IN DISPUTE, SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS APPROPRIATE IN THIS CASE. 1553

IV. THE FEDERAL TAXPAYER PLAINTIFFS HAVE STANDING TO BRING THIS ACTION BECAUSE THEY RAISE AN ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE CHALLENGE TO THE

TABLE OF CONTENTS -

Page

AFLA, WHICH WAS ENACTED PURSUANT TO THE TAXING AND SPENDING CLAUSE. 1554

V. BECAUSE THE AFLA DOES NOT MAKE EXPLICIT AND DELIBERATE DISTINCTIONS AMONG RELIGIONS, THE COURT MUST USE THE TRIPARTITE TEST SET FORTH IN LEMON V. KURTZMAN TO EVALUATE THE STATUTE. 1556

VI. ALTHOUGH THE AFLA HAS…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bowen v. KendrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Kendrick v. SullivanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
  3. Kendrick v. SullivanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991
  4. Bowen v. KendrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Opinion No. Oag 53-87, (1987), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API