Kendrick v. Bowen
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I. INTRODUCTION 1551
II. BACKGROUND 1552
III. BECAUSE THE MATERIAL FACTS ARE NOT IN DISPUTE, SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS APPROPRIATE IN THIS CASE. 1553
IV. THE FEDERAL TAXPAYER PLAINTIFFS HAVE STANDING TO BRING THIS ACTION BECAUSE THEY RAISE AN ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE CHALLENGE TO THE
TABLE OF CONTENTS -
Page
AFLA, WHICH WAS ENACTED PURSUANT TO THE TAXING AND SPENDING CLAUSE. 1554
V. BECAUSE THE AFLA DOES NOT MAKE EXPLICIT AND DELIBERATE DISTINCTIONS AMONG RELIGIONS, THE COURT MUST USE THE TRIPARTITE TEST SET FORTH IN LEMON V. KURTZMAN TO EVALUATE THE STATUTE. 1556
VI. ALTHOUGH THE AFLA HAS…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bowen v. KendrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Kendrick v. SullivanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
- Kendrick v. SullivanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991
- Bowen v. KendrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Opinion No. Oag 53-87, (1987), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.