Legal Opinion
Kendrick v. Sullivan
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 9, 1991No. Civ. A. 83-3175 (CRR)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
A diverse group including federal taxpayers, clergy, and the American Jewish Congress brought this suit on the grounds that the Adolescent Family Life Act (“AFLA”), on its face and as applied, violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment 1 by, inter alia, funding religious organizations to counsel adolescents on premarital sexual relations and pregnancy. This Court rendered an opinion finding that the AFLA violated the Establishment Clause both on its face and as applied. Kendrick v. Bowen, 657 F.Supp. 1547 (D.D.C.1987). In a 5-4…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commercial Data Servers, Inc. v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Mitchell v. DCX, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- (2003), Maryland Attorney General Reports2003