Legal Opinion
Van Den Bosch v. Bouwman
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1904No. Docket No. 15PublishedCited by 15 opinions
Error to Ottawa; Padgham, J.. Assumpsit by Peter Van Den Bosch against Torn Bouwman on a promissory note. There was judgment, for plaintiff and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Montgomery, j.
Defendant, on receiving of plaintiff possession of the property described therein, executed and delivered to plaintiff the following note:
“$160.00.
“Noordeloos, Ottawa Co., Mich., May 27, 1901.
“ After date I promise to pay to Peter Van Den Bosch, or bearer, One Hundred Sixty Dollars, payable at the residence of Peter Van Den Bosch, Noordeloos, Mich., for value received, by monthly payments of $10.00 per month or more; said first payment to be made J une 10th, A. D. 1901.
*625“The express condition of the sale and purchase of a sorrel horse, harness, and top buggy, for which this note…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McBryan v. Universal Elevator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Choate v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- F. J. Dewes Brewery Co. v. MerrittMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Perkins v. GrobbenMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by15 opinions
- Atkinson v. JapinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Continental Guaranty Corp. v. Peoples Bus LineSuperior Court of Delaware · 1922
- Bunday v. Columbus Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
- John Deere Plow Co. v. MowryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- International Harvester Co. v. BauerOregon Supreme Court · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.