Legal Opinion

Pandaleon v. Brecker

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1924No. Docket No. 28PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Defendant signed and delivered to plaintiffs’ agent the following writing:

“Chicago, Illinois.

August 20, 1920.

“Sold to Mr. Jack Brecker,
“Detroit, Mich.
“Through our agents — Messrs. Ward L. Andrus & Co. of Detroit, Mich.
“Payment terms: 10 days less 1%, against documents.
“Shipment from Smyrna in Pool Car in October.
“Weights guaranteed within the usual 1%.
“250 — 25 lb. boxes Black Smyrna Raisins No. 3, at 21c per pound F. O. B. Detroit. Duty paid.

(Signed) “Jack Brecker.”

Parol testimony was received without objection to the effect that a duplicate of this paper signed by plaintiffs was at the same…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Piowaty v. SheldonMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Solomon v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taskey v. PaquetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Powers & Co. v. American Society of Tool EngineersMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API