Legal Opinion
Robert H. Fox Co. v. Keystone Driller Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 18, 1956No. Nos. 11622, 11623PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
These appeals are taken by Keystone Drilling Co., a corporation (“Keystone”), from adverse judgments entered in two diversity actions consolidated for trial without jury in the district court. Keystone asserts that the district court erred in its findings, made pursuant to Rule 52, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.; as to damages caused by Keystone's breach of contract; as to disallowance of credits claimed, and as to the computation of interest.
Keystone and Robert H. Fox Co., a partnership (“Fox Co.”), entered into a contract in September, 1948, for a term…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Oregon State Medical SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Krauss v. GreenbargCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- York Metal & Alloys Co. v. Cyclops Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Laborers Combined Funds v. MatteiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Samuel B. Slaughter, Jr. v. The Philadelphia National Bank v. Peoples National Bank of Camden CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Joseph v. Krull Wholesale Drug Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Burlesque Artists Association v. I. Hirst Enterprises, Inc., and Jay HornickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Zweifach v. SCRANTON LACE COMPANYDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.