Joseph v. Krull Wholesale Drug Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
This case is before the court on plaintiff’s post-trial motions after a jury rendered a special verdict in defendant’s favor in this contract action. Considering the testimony in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, the facts will be summarized below.
Following preliminary meetings with the officers of the defendant company, 1 the plaintiff, Charles E. Joseph, on Wednesday, October 17, 1951, at the Warwick Hotel in Philadelphia met with Paul D. Helfrieh, President, and Harry C. Andersen, Vice-President and Secretary, of the defendant company. At this time,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Cooper v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Evans v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Boyle v. SteimanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. WoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- John H. Cromling v. The Pittsburgh and Lake Erie R.R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Young Door Co., Eastern Div. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.