Legal Opinion

York Metal & Alloys Co. v. Cyclops Steel Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 19, 1924No. Appeal, No. 316PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

The plaintiff, York Metal & Alloys Company, agreed, on June 20, 1920, to sell defendant 85,000 pounds of tungsten powder at a fixed price, one-half to be delivered by the first of January following. This contract was executed in New York, though the place of performance was Pennsylvania, where both parties had their respee*587tive business offices. Prior to April 8, 1921, more than one-half of all of the product purchased was delivered, and the balance had been prepared and held in the warehouse of plaintiff awaiting Shipping orders. In the meantime, disputes arose…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Ball Club, Ltd. v. LajoieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Flegal v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Barnes v. ReaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Boyer v. NesbittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Dreifus v. Columbian Exposition Salvage Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. General Mills, Inc. v. SnavelySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Hillcrest Foundation, Inc. v. McFeatersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Alpha Portland Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  4. Langer v. Superior Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Texas Motorcoaches, Inc. v. A. C. F. Motors Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API