Legal Opinion

Steele v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 5, 1934No. 31,653PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action for specific performance of a contract to purchase real estate. Judgment was for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

Briefly the facts are as follows: The Brehm Realty Company is a firm of realtors in Hutchinson. Bob Brehm is a member of that firm. He learned that plaintiff wished to sell her home in Hutchinson, together with another house that stood adjacent to it. He talked to defendant about buying the property and showed it to him. *560Brehm then had a talk with plaintiff, who said that she would take $8,000 for the real estate…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Barry v. CoombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Inglis v. FoheyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Berg v. ScullySupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Skinner v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. Zelleken v. LynchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shepard v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  2. Clark v. CarterMississippi Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Hays v. Underwood, AdministratorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. Botkin v. Security State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  5. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API