Botkin v. Security State Bank
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Nuss, J.:
This case requires us to determine whether certain written guaranties are enforceable. After Security State Bank’s borrower, Botkin, LLC, defaulted on its loan obligations, David Botkin and 33 others filed a declaratory judgment action to determine whether their signed guaranty agreements were enforceable under the statute of frauds, K.S.A. 33-106. The Bank filed a counterclaim seeking to enforce the guaranties. The district court granted the guarantors’ motion for summary judgment, and the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded in Botkin v.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Barry v. CoombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Bomhoff v. Nelnet Loan Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005
- Walton v. Piqua State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- Barnhart v. McKinneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Wemhoff v. Investors Management Corp. of AmericaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cooke v. GillespieSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Genesis Health Club, Inc. v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Central Natural Resources, Inc. v. Davis Operating Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- M West, Inc. v. Oak Park Mall, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
- Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. Coleman Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.