Legal Opinion

Botkin v. Security State Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 17, 2006No. 92,380PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nuss, J.:

This case requires us to determine whether certain written guaranties are enforceable. After Security State Bank’s borrower, Botkin, LLC, defaulted on its loan obligations, David Botkin and 33 others filed a declaratory judgment action to determine whether their signed guaranty agreements were enforceable under the statute of frauds, K.S.A. 33-106. The Bank filed a counterclaim seeking to enforce the guaranties. The district court granted the guarantors’ motion for summary judgment, and the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded in Botkin v.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Barry v. CoombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Bomhoff v. Nelnet Loan Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. Walton v. Piqua State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. Barnhart v. McKinneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. Wemhoff v. Investors Management Corp. of AmericaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cooke v. GillespieSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Genesis Health Club, Inc. v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  3. Central Natural Resources, Inc. v. Davis Operating Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. M West, Inc. v. Oak Park Mall, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  5. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. Coleman Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API