Legal Opinion

Berg v. Scully

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1926No. 26,556PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

The plaintiff, a tenant, sought to recover the value of improvements owned by him on land of the defendant, his land*638lord. A demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence was sustained and be appeals.

The defendant and his father (William Scully) before him have owned and controlled large tracts of land in Marion and other counties for perhaps more than a half century. (Scully v. Dodge, 40 Kan. 395, 19 Pac. 807.) They have rented the lands to tenants under a lease which provides for improvement of the land by the tenant. The land here involved had been…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Canal Co. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Glencoe Land & Gravel Co. v. Hudson Bros. Commission Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  3. Smythe v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  4. Fitzgerald v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Smith v. ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Mobile Acres, Inc. v. KurataSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Quenzer v. QuenzerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. Tate v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. Clutter v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  5. Crestview Bowl, Inc. v. Womer Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API