Cody v. . England
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.
While the plaintiffs bring forward and press for error numerous exceptive assignments, we think it appropriate to advert only to the exceptions to the refusal of the court to set aside the verdict and to the judgment. These are well taken and must be sustained.
The controversy is one of location of the boundaries of the land in question, rather than of title to such lands as are covered by the grants under which the respective parties claim. Such title is not controverted. The second and sixth issues relate to location. The answer to the third, fourth, seventh and eighth issues are dependent…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Emery v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- State v. . WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Sitterson v. . SittersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Donnell v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- State v. . SnipesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pendergrast v. AikenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Gibson v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Goodwin v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Coffey v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Hardy v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.