Sitterson v. . Sitterson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.
C. S., 1659, prescribes the grounds upon which an absolute divorce may be granted by the courts. Subsection 4 provides that an absolute divorce may be granted on application of the party injured “if there has been a separation of husband and wife, and they have lived separate and apart for five successive years, and the plaintiff in the suit for divorce has resided in this State for that' period.” Therefore, the injured party, in order to secure an absolute divorce, is required to allege and prove:
1. The marriage.
2. Separation for five successive years.
3. That the plaintiff in the suit has…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sprinkle v. Wellborn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Jones v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Reynolds v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- City of Durham v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Lawrence v. . BeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Snodgrass v. HandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- State v. . WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Hutchins v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Taylor v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.