North Shore Boom and Driving Company v. Nicomen Boom Company
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. The Nicomen. Boom Company, hereinafter called the plaintiff, commenced an action against -the North Shore Boom- and Driving Company, hereinafter called the defendant, in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, Pacific County, to enjoin the defendant from building a boom in the North River, (a river wholly within the boundary of the State of Washington), within the/locality designated in; the plaintiff’s plat and…
Read the full summary
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. The Nicomen. Boom Company, hereinafter called the plaintiff, commenced an action against -the North Shore Boom- and Driving Company, hereinafter called the defendant, in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, Pacific County, to enjoin the defendant from building a boom in the North River, (a river wholly within the boundary of the State of Washington), within the/locality designated in; the plaintiff’s plat and survey for its boom. The action was founded upon the allegations that the plaintiff was the first to file its plat., and…
1Opinion of the Court
Mr.'Justice Peckham,
after making the foregoing. statement, delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a contest between two boom companies incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington, authorizing the organization of corporations of this kind.
In April, 1900, the plaintiff, after its organization, .filed in the office of the Secretary of State of Washington its plat or 'survey, showing so much of 'the shore lines and waters of the North River and lands contiguous thereto as it proposed to appropriate under the laws of the State. Before beginning its boom it submitted to the Secretary…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Willamette Iron Bridge Co. v. HatchSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Cummings v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Montgomery v. PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- United States v. Bellingham Bay Boom Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pembroke Pembroke v. Peninsular Terminal Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
- State ex rel. Nicomen Boom Co. v. North Shore Boom & Driving Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- United States v. Luis Ramirez FerrerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Daniel Allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Northlake Marine Works, Inc. v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.