Legal Opinion

Dingman v. City of Sapulpa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 13, 1910No. 1528PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Creek County; W.-L. Barnum, Judge. Action by B. B. Dingman against the City of Sapnlpa. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.

This proceeding is brought to reverse an order of the lower court denying an injunction. Plaintiff in error, by his petition in the lower court, seeks to enjoin the city of Sapulpa, defendant in error, from issuing and selling $30,000 of negotiable bonds for the purpose of constructing approaches.to viaducts upon the streets of said city. The city is about to issue the bonds in pursuance of an ordinance of the conucil and an election had, at which.a majority of the votes of the qualified tax paving voter» of the city was cast in favor of the issuance of the bonds. Both parties agree that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coleman v. FrameSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thurston, County Treasurer v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Dunagan v. Town of Red RockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Town of Afton v. GillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Denton v. City of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. City of Lawton v. MorfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API