Legal Opinion
Hood v. Jones
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 29, 1935No. 26575PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This is an appeal from a. judgment of the district court of Cleveland county awarding a peremptory writ of mandamus commanding the plaintiffs in error, in their official capacity as officers of the city of Norman, to provide in the estimate of needs of said city for the fiscal year 1935-36, a sum sufficient to pay one annual installment of a paving assessment made and levied against said city in special paving district No. 36, in said city, together with a sum sufficient to pay the interest on the unpaid balance of said assessment, and a sum sufficient to pay one installment of an assessment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coleman v. FrameSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- City of Perry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Berry v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- City of Lawton v. MorfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Dingman v. City of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cobb v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. SummersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- State ex rel. City of Ada v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- City of Enid ex rel. Versluis v. RobinsonDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1941
- Garfield Inv. Corp. v. City of EnidDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1954