State v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Sept. Term, 2000, Sept. Term 2002.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.
In these cases, consolidated for the purpose of this decision, we again consider the scope of double jeopardy protections under Maryland common law. Specifically, we decide whether jeopardy attaches in a proceeding where a trial judge grants a pretrial motion to dismiss based on a finding of insufficiency of evidentiary facts beyond those contained within the “four corners” of the charging document, i.e., criminal indictment or criminal information.
*621We set out the background facts and procedural history of each case separately.
I
A. Bledsoe v. State
Petitioners Larry Bledsoe, George Kopp, and…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Giddins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- State v. FennellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Scriber v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- In Re Roneika S.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.