Legal Opinion

Giddins v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 12, 2006No. 84 September Term, 2005PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATTAGLIA, Judge.

Petitioner, Damont Isaiah Giddins, seeks review of the Court of Special Appeals’s judgment affirming the denial of his “Motion to Bar Retrial Following Mistrial (Double Jeopardy)” after the Circuit Court for Worcester County had granted Mr. Giddins’s motion for mistrial during direct examination of the State’s first witness. We granted certiorari in this case to answer the following questions:

1. Whether the trial court entered an order that was a “favorable termination,” tantamount to an acquittal of Petitioner, when it granted a mistrial and discharged the jury, and…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. FauciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Connors v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Moore v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  5. State v. FennellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API