Commonwealth v. Cruice

Appellant was convicted of damaging an unattended vehicle and failing to stop or report the accident.1 Appellant contends that the trial court erred in finding that the Commonwealth offered sufficient evidence to sustain his conviction. For the following reasons we vacate the judgment of sentence, and remand to permit appellant to file post verdict motions nunc pro tunc.

The facts adduced at trial are as follows. At dusk on February 9,1979, appellant was driving a late model station wagon on the Schuylkill Expressway in Montgomery County. His vehicle swerved and struck a sportscar parked on…