Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Jarema

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1991No. 02135PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, Judge:

Appellant appeals from an order denying his petition to appeal, nunc pro tunc, two summary convictions to the Court of Common Pleas. We reverse and remand.

Each of Appellant’s convictions were for driving a motor vehicle while his operator’s license was under suspension. 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1543(a).1 No appeals were taken within thirty days as required by Pa.R.Crim.P. 86. In due time, Appellant received notice from the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation that his operating privileges would be further suspended due to these convictions. He then filed the aforementioned petition,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. North v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. KochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. EnglertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. RickCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. BassionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. YoheSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Garrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth Department of Transportation v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API