Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Patterson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1982No. Appeal No. 870PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

On March 12, 1981, appellant was adjudicated guilty of a summary offense after a trial de novo in a court of common pleas. He filed no post-trial motions before taking this appeal. In Commonwealth v. Koch, 288 Pa. Superior Ct. 290, 431 A.2d 1052 (1981), we held that post-trial motions are a prerequisite to preserve issues for appellate review following such a trial de novo. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 1123. However, when no post-trial motions were filed and the adjudication occurred before July 1, 1981, we have remanded to allow appellant to file post-trial motions nunc pro tunc. E.g., Commonwealth v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. CruiceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. McNelisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GiuglianoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. Florida-Eastern U.S. Van Lines, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API