Legal Opinion

Frick Et Al. v. Pennsylvania

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 1, 1925No. Nos. 122-125PublishedCited by 143 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Devanter

These four eases involve the constitutional, validity of particular features of a statute of Pennsylvania imposing a tax on the transfer of property by will or intestate laws. Act No. 258; Pa. Laws 1919, 521.

Henry C. Frick, domiciled in Pennsylvania, died testate December 2, 1919, leaving a large estate. By his will he disposed of the entire estate — giving about 53 per cent, for charitable and public purposes and passing the rest to or for the use of individual beneficiaries. Besides real and personal property in Pennsylvania, the estate included tangible personalty having an actual situs in…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  5. Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by143 opinions

  1. Frick v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Rossi v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Keesecker v. BirdWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Kuchel v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Tharalson v. State Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1978

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API