Legal Opinion
Frick v. Pennsylvania
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 1, 1925No. 122, 123, 124, 125PublishedCited by 249 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
268 U.S. 473 (1925)
FRICK ET AL.
v.
PENNSYLVANIA.
Nos. 122, 123, 124, 125.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued December 7, 1923.
Decided June 1, 1925.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
Messrs. George Wharton Pepper and George B. Gordon for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. David A. Reed, with whom Messrs. George W. Woodruff, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Maynard Teall were on the brief, for defendant in error.
Messrs. Carl Sherman, Attorney General of New York, and Seth T. Cole filed a brief as amici curiae, for the State of New York, by special leave of Court.
2Opinion of the Court · DevanterJustice Van Devanter
These four cases involve the…
3Cases cited26 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by249 opinions
- Nichols v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Miller Brothers Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Curry v. McCanlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
244 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.