Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Erickson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 12, 2004No. 2002-CA-002084-MRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMBS, Judge.

Pursuant to KBS 1 22A.020(4), the Commonwealth has appealed from an order of September 11, 2002, of the McCracken Circuit Court that granted Steven Erickson’s motion to suppress evidence seized from his vehicle. The Commonwealth challenges the ruling that Erickson’s consent to the search of his vehicle resulted from an unconstitutional detention. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the trial court erred as a matter of law in suppressing the evidence. Therefore, we reverse and remand.

On May 30, 2002, a McCracken County grand jury indicted Erickson on charges of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. State v. RobinetteOhio Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Payton v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Dunn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2006
  3. Farmer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005
  4. Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Holly CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2020
  5. Commonwealth v. AlberhaskyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API