Farmer v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHRODER, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment pursuant to a conditional guilty plea to two counts of second-degree assault stemming from an automobile collision. Appellant argues that the toxicology results of a blood/urine test should have been suppressed because he only gave his consent to have his blood tested for alcohol, not controlled substances, pursuant to a consent form presented to him at the hospital. We adjudge that appellant’s initial general consent to police was not limited by the consent form subsequently submitted to appellant by the hospital. Accordingly, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Guido Riascos-Suarez A/K/A Kennedy Diuza-RiascosCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Helphenstine v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
- F. v. BrownKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- Rawls v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
- Leatherman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011
- Matthews v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.