Legal Opinion

City of Covington v. McKinney

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 10, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Richardson

Affirming.

To recover damages to Ms residence, its contents, and the yard to his residence, of the city of Covington, caused by the city maintaining inadequate ditches on its premises and permitting the same to become stopped up, thereby causing the water of ordinary rainfall, flowing from its premises, to be accelerated and concentrated onto their premises, Claude and Anna McKinney brought this action. On a trial before a jury a verdict of $1,000 was returned in their favor on which a judgment was entered, and from which this appeal is prosecuted.

For…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Louisville, Henderson & St. Louis Railway Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Madisonville, Hartford & Eastern Railroad v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. WhitsellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  5. Dugan v. LongCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lynn Mining Co. v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
  2. First National Bank of Kansas City v. DanforthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  3. City of Tucson v. Apache MotorsArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Kentucky-Ohio Gas Co. v. BowlingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  5. Wimmer v. City of Ft. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API