Legal Opinion

Kentucky-Ohio Gas Co. v. Bowling

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 26, 1936PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Richardson

Reversing.

This action is to recover damages for creating and maintaining a private nuisance to the annoyance of the owner and his family and depreciating the market value of his home.

For ten or twelve years next before its institution, Ed. Bowling owned, and he and his family occupied, a home about two and a half miles from the corporate limits of the city of Ashland, in the outlying portion of the city, in what is known as Hood’s Creek and Hood’s Creek Road. It is a five-room cottage, with a cement block foundation placed below the surface. It was…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Harrisonville v. W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Rosehill Cemetery Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Shelley v. Ozark Pipe Line CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. Highland Avenue & Belt Railroad v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Louisville Refining Company v. MuddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  3. City of Tucson v. Apache MotorsArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Kentucky West Virginia Gas Co. v. LaffertyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
  5. Lewis v. City of PotosiMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API