Legal Opinion

Louisville, Henderson & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 17, 1911PublishedCited by 61 opinions

Appeal from Ohio Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

— Reversing.

This action was instituted by the appellee in the Ohio Circuit Court to recover damages for the diversion by *821the appellant of water from a natural stream, thereby causing it to overflow appellee’s land.

The charge in the petition as amended is that the appellant company “negligently reconstructed its embankment by raising the same, and in doing so negligently cut away its right of way where the natural stream crosses the railroad company’s right of way, and removed the earth which naturally formed the banks of said stream where same crossed said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisville & N. R. R. v. HarrodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. WhitsellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. City of Norwood v. SheenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Southern Railway v. Kentucky Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Arcelay v. Sánchez MartínezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Jolly's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Madisonville, Hartford & Eastern Railroad v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API