Legal Opinion

Houchin v. Braham Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1938No. 31,562PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

On February 15, 1930, plaintiff and his wife executed a contract in writing for the purchase of a farm from defendant company for $6,500. A payment of $1,200 was made upon execution of the con tract, which provided for the balance in specified deferred payments and the assumption of a mortgage. During negotiations leading to the contract, defendant Olson, the vendor’s agent, falsely and fraudulently represented to plaintiff that the farm was free of peat land, thistles, and quack grass. Plaintiff took possession February 16, 1930, and that spring learned that much of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Shively v. Semi-Tropic Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Olson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Phelps v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Winter v. KittoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Chandler v. WilderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Brooks v. JensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  3. L'Evesque v. RognrudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Northwest Hotel Corp. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Clampitt v. A.M.R. Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API