Legal Opinion

United States v. Coburn

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided March 17, 1995No. NMCM 94 01528PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEATING, Judge:

The issue in this appeal is whether the appellant is entitled to administrative credit against the adjudged sentence when his pretrial confinement review was conducted without the military counsel he requested in accordance with Rule for Courts-Martial [R.C.M.] 305(f). We hold that when a prisoner makes such a request, the Government is required to provide counsel in advance of the initial review hearing unless the prisoner expressly withdraws the request. We further hold that, when requested military counsel is not provided, waiver of the presence of counsel at the hearing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. DonohewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. JordanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. AndrewsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  4. United States v. BallesterosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  5. United States v. DeLoatchU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. RedlinskiU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
  2. United States v. PlowmanNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
  3. United States v. RedlinskiU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API