Lowe v. Hiatt
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
Petitioner, a prisoner at the United States Penitentiary, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, who refers to himself as Rev. Richard Anderson Lowe, has filed an application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus which together with his various supplemental pleadings and communications is comprised chiefly of a great deal of useless, meaningless, redundant and unnecessary verbiage. Sifting from the chaff, what may be called wheat, we would summarize his contentions as follows:
1. The indictment charges no offense.
2. There is no valid commitment.
3. He has an appeal pending, and has elected not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Palmigiano v. TravisonoDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1970
- David Green v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Kochie v. NortonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1972
- Fallis v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Lowe v. HiattDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.