Legal Opinion

Lowe v. Hiatt

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1948No. 217PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLMER, District Judge.

Petitioner, a prisoner at the United States Penitentiary, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, who refers to himself as Rev. Richard Anderson Lowe, has filed an application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus which together with his various supplemental pleadings and communications is comprised chiefly of a great deal of useless, meaningless, redundant and unnecessary verbiage. Sifting from the chaff, what may be called wheat, we would summarize his contentions as follows:

1. The indictment charges no offense.

2. There is no valid commitment.

3. He has an appeal pending, and has elected not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. United States v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Palmigiano v. TravisonoDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1970
  2. David Green v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  3. Kochie v. NortonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1972
  4. Fallis v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Lowe v. HiattDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API