Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Hull
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 31, 1941PublishedCited by 533 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy
In January, 1936, petitioner was convicted of a statutory sex offense and was sentenced to the Michigan state prison at Jackson, Michigan, for an indeterminate term of six months to ten years. About ten months later he was paroled. In October, 1937, he was convicted of another sex offense and was returned to the same prison to serve a sentence of two and one-half to five years from entry of the second judgment. Apparently for the sole reason that the second conviction was regarded as a violation of his parole, petitioner was given a hearing before the state parole board and was passed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Ledbetter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Carter v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- First Nat. Bank of Guthrie Center v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by533 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
528 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.