Legal Opinion

Lowe v. Hiatt

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 1948No. 217PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLMER, District Judge.

Petitioner, Richard Anderson Lowe, filed his application for writ of habeas corpus in forma pauperis. In an opinion and order D.C., 77 F.Supp. 303, I denied the writ, stating my reasons therefor. The question now before me is whether an appeal in forma pauperis should be allowed and an order entered for copies of records to be prepared without payment of costs for use therein. The papers filed constitute a direction to the Clerk of Court, but same are being considered as an application.

The right to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is entirely statutory.1 It is a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. GillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  2. De Groot v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  3. Fisher v. CushmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  4. In re FullamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  5. Lowe v. HiattDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Willis v. UtechtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  2. United States v. LottDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1959
  3. Lowe v. HumphreyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API