Legal Opinion

State v. Gerber

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 2, 2015No. 20130091-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Decision

CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:

T1 Marva Rolena Gerber appeals her aggravated-arson conviction following a jury trial. Gerber argues on appeal that her trial counsel rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance, that the trial court failed to properly instruct the jury on cireumstantial evidence, and that the trial court erred in denying her motion for a new trial. We affirm.

T2 Gerber was charged with aggravated arson after the vacant house she had contracted to buy was set on fire.1 At trial, the State argued that Gerber was responsible for the arson but relied on cireumstantial…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Burt v. TitlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. State v. TemplinUtah Supreme Court · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SuhailCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
  2. State v. LantzCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  3. State v. GerberCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API