Legal Opinion

Burt v. Titlow

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 5, 2013No. 12-414PublishedCited by 2,039 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alito

*15When a state prisoner asks a federal court to set aside a sentence due to ineffective assistance of counsel during plea bargaining, our cases require that the federal court use a " 'doubly deferential' " standard of review that gives both the state court and the defense attorney the benefit of the doubt. Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U.S. ----, ----, 131 S.Ct. 1388, 1403, 179 L.Ed.2d 557 (2011). In this case, the Sixth Circuit failed to apply that doubly deferential standard by refusing to credit a state court's reasonable factual finding and by assuming that counsel was ineffective where the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,039 opinions

  1. Brown v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
  2. Woods v. EthertonSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Edward Thomas Kendrick, III v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Brumfield v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Ledford v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016

2,034 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API