Legal Opinion

Pierce v. General Motors Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1993No. 91687, (Calendar No. 9)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

In this case we are asked to review the award of workers’ compensation benefits granted on the basis of alcoholism and a related nervous condition suffered by plaintiff.1 We find that the wcab erroneously included the plaintiff’s personal addiction to alcohol as a' variable in its decision to award disability benefits. Thus, we vacate the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand to the board to determine whether plaintiff sustained any disabling personal injury that is separate and apart from any disability caused by his alcoholism.

I

Plaintiff, born January 11, 1942, began his em*140ployment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Aquilina v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Deziel v. Difco Laboratories, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Dan River, Inc. v. ShinallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Gacioch v. Stroh Brewery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Darnell v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Graves v. Warner Bros.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Graves v. Warner Bros.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Pierce v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API