Legal Opinion

Gacioch v. Stroh Brewery Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1986No. 75002, (Calendar No. 13)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArcher, J.

This case involves a claim for workers’ compensation benefits for the chronic alcoholism suffered by plaintiff. We must determine whether, under the circumstances extant in this case, chronic alcoholism suffered by plaintiff who, during breaks drank beer provided free by Stroh Brewery pursuant to a collectively bargained contract provision negotiated by the union is compensable under the Workers’ Disability Compensation Act1 as a personal injury which arose out of and in the course of plaintiff’s employment. This is a matter of first impression in the courts of this state.2_

*614On the basis of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McClary v. WagonerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Mills v. Detroit Tuberculosis SanitariumMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. McClure v. General MotorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. KLLM, Inc. v. FowlerMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Pierce v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Gacioch v. Stroh Brewery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Helen Jordan v. Department of Health and Human ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Helen Jordan v. Department of Health and Human ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API