Graves v. Warner Bros.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1DissentMurphy, P.J.
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion because the issue of foreseeability concerning the shotgun slaying was properly placed in the hands of the jury. Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to plaintiffs, I believe that the issue was properly left to the jury where the evidence indicated that Jonathan Schmitz was humiliated and devastated on a show scheduled to be broadcast1 on national television by defendants through the revelation of a homosexual crush and lurid sexual fantasy by Scott Amedure after Schmitz told defendants that he did not want the crush to be *503that of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Muschany v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Williams v. Cunningham Drug Stores, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.