McDougald v. Low
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Hartley F. Peart, and U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The district court of appeal of the first district reversed the judgment of the court below herein. Upon respondents’ application a rehearing was granted and the cause was transferred to this court for decision. Upon further consideration we approve the opinion written by Mr. Justice Hall and rendered by the district court of appeal. It is as follows:
“This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the superior court, fixing the amount of the inheritance tax to be paid on certain shares of stock in three several California corporations, passing under the residuary clause of the will of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In re the Estate of WilmerdingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Murphy v. CrouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Railway Companies v. FosterTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- In re Transfer Tax upon the Estate of PorterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1910
- Stevens v. UnderhillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1883
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Estate of LetchworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Moorehouse v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Chambers v. MumfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- McDougald v. LilienthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.