McDougald v. Lilienthal
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. E. P. Mogan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Albert Lilienthal, a nonresident of this state and a resident of the state of New York, died intestate in the city and state of New York. At the time of his death he was the owner of 1,386 shares of the capital stock of the Lilienthal Company, a California corporation, having its principal place of business in the city and county of San Francisco. The certificates representing his ownership in the capital stock of the corporation were, at the time of the decedent’s death, in the city of New York. This property was distributed in probate proceedings by the courts of the state of New York, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tilt v. KelseySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- In Re the Appraisal for Taxation of the Property of BronsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Kennedy v. McDougalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Greves v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- In Re the Appraisal, Under the Legacy & Inheritance Tax Act, of the Property of JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Anglo California Nat. Bank of San Francisco v. LazardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Untermeyer v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1942
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Anglo-California Tr. Co. v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Chambers v. MumfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.