Moorehouse v. Robinson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Cecil and Floyd Moorehouse, grandsons of deceased, petitioned the court below to ascertain and declare who are entitled to share in the distribution of the estate and the proportions of each. Following a hearing upon such petition and the answer thereto the court entered its decree making such determination. This appeal is from those portions of the decree which “deny the right of said petitioners to share equally” with their cousin Cleo in the residue of decedent’s estate which remains after first deducting the costs of administration, a legacy of $1,000 and a specific devise to Stella…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Estate of DominiciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- McCray v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Wayne v. HuberOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Estate of JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- McDougald v. LowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Salmonski v. BardzinskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Estate of LefrancCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Roy B. Thompson, Jr., of the Will of Roy B. Thompson, Deceased v. Earl R. Wiseman, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Mathie v. SchwarzeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Cechovin v. EgglestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.